“It was the largest church service I’ve ever seen.” I don’t think the NPR reporter who spoke these words knew how perceptive she was being. Sometimes mixing politics and religion produces a new religion.
From Obama’s misuse of Scripture (1 Cor. 13:11) in his inaugural speech to the irreverence of the closing prayer, the evidence that Christianity has been remade into an American religion is obvious. Rick Warren himself prayed more as an American than as a Christian, including everyone present regardless of faith: “Help us, O God, to remember that we are Americans–united not by race or religion or blood, but to our commitment to freedom and justice for all.”
We as worshippers in this great religion (call it “Americanity”?) are to leave this mountaintop inaugural revival in “the spirit of fellowship and the oneness of our family,” as the Rev. Lowery put it (apparently the good reverend forgot what Paul wrote in Romans 8:9). We are to take this power with us as we return “to our homes, our workplaces, our churches, our temples, our mosques, or wherever we seek your [presumably God's?] will.”
We have our marching orders and we have our hope, a hope illustrated in Scripture with the imagery of swords being beaten into plowshares and spears into pruning hooks (cf., Isa. 2:4; Joel 3:10; Micah 4:3) which, for Christians, refer to the new heavens and new earth, but to adherents of the American religion, this hope is now made possible due to a newly inaugurated president.
Indeed, it was a large church service, but let’s be more clear on nature of the faith being practiced. And it’s not Christianity.
Recommended reading:
- Stephen J. Nichols, Jesus Made in America: A Cultural History from the Puritans to the Passion of the Christ
. Nichols was recently interviewed on the topic of this book by Ken Myers on Mars Hill Audio Journal 92 and on the Christ the Center podcast.
- Nathan O. Hatch, The Democratization of American Christianity
. A more academic work than Nichols’, Hatch demonstrates persuasively how revolutionary democratic principles wound up influencing American Christianity.



10 comments
Comments feed for this article
January 20, 2009 at 7:39 pm
Joseph
beautifully put!
January 29, 2009 at 5:49 am
theogothic
Hey Casey,
This is Jacob from PB. My redneck on aquinas blog defuncted. I ran into technical problems.
January 29, 2009 at 2:02 pm
Jason
“Americanity”? Nicely done!
January 30, 2009 at 6:35 am
Paloma
It’s sad to see a Nation of God turn to other gods….. it seems to be clear now with Obama…. it definitely looked like a religion… but I think Christians have let this happen and have been part of it by having other gods … before “this one” … what am I talking about? well… I think money (as an example) has been worshiped like a “god” well before Obama…. I think America didn’t reach this level from one day to another but it had been giving clear and firm steps towards this and Christians have been part of the steps probably without noticing…. it’s like if we started drinking a beer everyday and then two and then three and then when you finally become an alcoholic you can’t even see it… I don’t know if I am making any sense here but I think this is just the result of “years” of “small decisions” that weren’t pleasant before God’s eyes….
I was also amazed to see those thousands of people gathered “praising” a man….. and unfortunately they seemed more joyous than many of us in Church on Sunday.
:( … Too bad
February 3, 2009 at 5:17 pm
Jacob
Hey Casey,
I agree, Wright’s rhetoric can seem that way, and some of his applications are horrible (while the essential framework is okay). Most of the social gospelers jettison conversion en toto. Wright doesn’t do that.
I remember when I was in seminary many people had the mindset–Reformed Westminsterian people–that if you wanted to be salt in the world, you were a no good social gospel liberal.
Of course at that time I was reading a lot of Bahnsen and Dooyeweerd, which made the social gospel charge kind of weird.
I agree with a lot of the criticisms of Wright’s applications of his theology–Doug Wilson has some fine ones–but he does acknolwedge the fall. His best theology is when he deals with Isaiah 55 and Romans 8: instead of the thorn (e.g., reference to a fall) shall come up the myrtle.
February 4, 2009 at 5:55 pm
theogothic
Hey Casey,
Mathison says that Nevin is the true heir of John Calvin on the Lord’s Supper. Mathison’s book _Given for You: Reclaiming Calvin’s Doctrine of the Lord’s Supper_ is an exciting read. He does a very good job of analyzing the debate between Nevin and Hodge. Following Calvinists Robert Letham and B. A. Gerrish he says that Nevin won the debate on the Lord’s Supper hands down.
Of course, Nevin has his own difficulties. There are a few pages where Nevin engages in special pleading, and his language often assumed the concepts of German Idealism (but then again, he was a child of his time).
February 4, 2009 at 8:30 pm
theogothic
Hey Casey,
I am aware of said article, though I haven’t read it. Mathison quotes that article extensively. I might try to find it on ebscohost.
February 5, 2009 at 8:11 pm
theogothic
Hello Casey,
No, I am not familiar with David Koyzis. I think I have seen the name somewhere, though.
February 6, 2009 at 5:06 pm
theogothic
Hey Casey,
I am about to head to a wedding supper. I will give you the footnotes, and perhaps some context as I understand it, when I get back. I will confess that I could be reading Nevin through the lends of MA Sadler.
September 29, 2009 at 2:40 am
Andy
Very well written and I couldn’t agree more! I will definitely be checking in on your blog from time to time! God bless!